Friday, March 28, 2014
The classic jumbled thesis
Moffett's most important ideas that he has contributed to the field of teaching writing are student-centered, teacher-centered, teacher and student relationship and class room process through pre-writing, mid-writing, and post-writing.
Thursday, March 27, 2014
Class Agenda 3.28: Returning Moffett Paper, dialgoues
1. Blog: Writing Center Observation
2. Student consultations and Email: Compose brief email to professor explaining the following: do you understand where your grade came from on the Moffett paper? Were my comments clear? Do you have questions about my comments? And then: reflect on your writing process. How did you go about researching for this assignment? Did you consult any books other than Active Voice? Why or why not? Were all your sources web sources? Why or why not? Did you consult the course blog expectations about the ENG 101 essay? Why or why not? And then: revision. Do you plan to revise? What is your plan for revision? What would you do differently next time?
3. Review of Moffett Essays and writing expectations: class overview.
4. Dialogues: share your dialogues with the class. Professor and class will make final recommendations for revision.
5. Time permitting: pedagogy videos.
2. Student consultations and Email: Compose brief email to professor explaining the following: do you understand where your grade came from on the Moffett paper? Were my comments clear? Do you have questions about my comments? And then: reflect on your writing process. How did you go about researching for this assignment? Did you consult any books other than Active Voice? Why or why not? Were all your sources web sources? Why or why not? Did you consult the course blog expectations about the ENG 101 essay? Why or why not? And then: revision. Do you plan to revise? What is your plan for revision? What would you do differently next time?
3. Review of Moffett Essays and writing expectations: class overview.
4. Dialogues: share your dialogues with the class. Professor and class will make final recommendations for revision.
5. Time permitting: pedagogy videos.
To discuss based on papers
thesis statements
topic sentences
direct quotations: integrating quotes, paraphrasing quotes, explaining quotes
assignment directions
templates
citations
communicating to your reader in the essay
critical thinking strategies
research strategies
summarizing research
skimming
generic openings
fluff strategies
wordiness/word choice
writing process: time, space, drafts, expectations
topic sentences
direct quotations: integrating quotes, paraphrasing quotes, explaining quotes
assignment directions
templates
citations
communicating to your reader in the essay
critical thinking strategies
research strategies
summarizing research
skimming
generic openings
fluff strategies
wordiness/word choice
writing process: time, space, drafts, expectations
Sample of Slightly Above Average Moffett Essay (B/B-)
The
Ideas of James Moffett
The developmental theory of James
Moffett fit a dynamic systems perspective on development that predetermined
views of human development. The role of social media (technology) processes,
such as learning (education) and childrearing practices in child development
shows the theory of this educator. Moffett’s theory is to analyze the
development process of the student’s active construction of their knowledge,
the help they receive from teachers and how media impacted on their learning.
James
Moffett had created and contributed to the field of teaching writing. He always
wanted to prove that all the writers express their ideas in one or another way.
He used to say that "thinking processes formed the very basis of the while
sequence from first assignment to last" (Active Voice, 3) trying to prove
that the development of critical thinking on the student is extremely essential
in order for them to write a paper "Emphasis was on, and remains on, the
evolution of one kind do discourse into another, on progressions of assignments
that allow language experiences to build on and reinforce each other in
significant ways" (Active Voice, 3) critical thinking and language most
work together in order to provide the student the tools to start building their
future.
Furthermore, we have Vygotsky how
agrees with James Moffett on the theory that every student learn in a different
way and have different needs. Vygotsky believes that young children are curious
and actively involved in their own learning, the discovery and development of
new understandings (schema). Proving that students learn when they want to
learn and always like to incorporate new methods, an example of it can be
technology and the use of media between teachers and students sending an email
with the essay attached to it. You will never find students that learn,
understand and process the lesson at the same time and more if it was teach the
same way. Every human is different than the other one and that is what Moffett
tried to prove when he said that people didn't understand the funniest of
writing and that he didn't follow the procedure by the time he needed to write
the assignment. James did follow procedure but he wanted to add technology to
it so that the students can get more into the assignment then the attention
students used to give when they get their regular hand writing assignment. This
hand writing assignment which did not have any fun or attraction for the
students and they use to reuse to do it, Moffett had found the way to make
writing more fun for students of the XXI century adding media to it. Agreeing
to James Moffett the funniest that makes a good writing and/or reading is what
makes a good paper. But since people usually think that James Moffett does not
complete the assignment since he does not take it seriously but he points out
that no one sees the funniest part of writing. He argues that any type of
writing is a good writing “…poetry and other imaginative writing…” (Active
Voice, 4) it does not matter what students write the point is to have them
writing making grow their critical thinking skills and trying to incorporate
the new technology to attack their attention.
According to Moffett who is
supported for Vygotsky argued that we do not live in a social vacuum and it is
through people we socialize with, such as family and friends, “Try things out,
interest other teachers so you can trouble-shoot and brainstorm together, and
do the assignments yourself” (Active Voice, 23) a writer cannot easily write a
paper without discussing it first. The idea here is to have students make use
of the Process Model Stage using prewriting, which is having a student discuss
the information with another person that will take them to another level of
understanding but make them get to their own work, which later affect the way
we grow and develop our thinking.
As we know children learn on their
own time and it’s essential that an educated adult interact with them to help
during their learning process. James Moffett’s theory it’s based on the way
that children’s learn, which is on their own time and manner. The teachers most
guide them and correct them but it’s all up to the child if they want or don’t
want to learn something. James Moffett believes in the theory of stop and check
what each student is at, in terms of learning since everyone learns in a different
amount of time and in different ways. Teachers must pay attention to every
single student and the stage they are at when the teacher gives the lesson,
also based in the program “No Child Left Behind”.
James had created a program to
increase the writing skills comprised of Revising Inner Speech, Dialogues (talk
to a friend about what you think you can put in your paper and exchange ideas
about it) and Monologues “the teller will learn what her audience want to know
that she did not at first include” (Active Voice, 19) and Narrative into Essays
“assignments could mostly be printed and passed around” (Active Voice, 23) which
is also known as pair share. Moffett lays out his vision of how a teacher might
use technology in a language arts classroom: “A student learns by doing
projects organize curriculum which is basically the three I’s individualization
fill each individual student, interaction (human interaction by talking,
learning modality, media) and integration around the students and around
realistic projects” (Video) James theory should work out if technology and teachers
where just one by the time teachers go inside the classroom. Meaning that if
teachers used technology in an efficient manner/ way, an example of how
technology should be helpful if teachers most pauses the video every 10 to 15
minutes to explain the students what was the information presented about.
Technology can help the teachers to keep track of the students work.
Concluding with the theory of James
Moffett I will like to state that I agree with what Moffett tried to prove that
every student learn different with different techniques and in a different
amount of time. I come to an agreement that technology make a grand impact on
the learning process and that the most important role is the role of the
teacher helping the student to understand making pause during videos or regular
lesson making sure that the student is on the truck. Teachers most believe on
the idea of stop the lesson see where each student is at in terms of learning
since we conclude that ever student learn in a different time.
Works Cited
Moffett,
James. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Print.
Moffett on Media (2013,
July 2)
Theory of Cognitive Development. (2012, July 26).
Theory Of Cognitive Development.
Walcott, D. (n.d.). Rules & Policies. Language Access Plan. Retrieval from http://schools.nyc.gov/RulesPolicies/languagepolicy.htm
Sample of Weak Moffett Essay (F)
The
knowledge and skills of writing are extremely useful and significant for many
reasons. Not just having the “basic skills” but also being able to put your own
thoughts down on a piece of paper or even typing it on a computer, as we do
presently. "Together with handwriting, spelling and punctuation shift
speech from an oral to a visual medium, and because they are basic to literacy
are misleadingly call “basic skills” (276). It all begins with the language of
an individual. Writing is its physical form of communicating because it consists
of the person tracing words or characters on paper with a writing utensil (such
as pencil, pen, etc.).
"It is impossible to understand the teaching of writing in America if one does not realize that, in one form or another, from first grade through graduate school, it serves mostly to test reading” (276). Writing is used to test if a student can read and to what extent they can do this. The ability to do this can further your success in education and also future careers that you decide to pursue. Writing can be defined in different ways and have importance in different levels. This all depends on the person and educator.
As a future English teacher, I don’t see writing as just being a tester to a student’s reading ability. In my experience it has helped me express thoughts that I could not do verbally and honestly, in a more professional matter. I also find it as a stress reliever when my mind is scrambled with thoughts and in a sense it helps organization of them. Of course the ability to read is important and what the mind can intake from the reading one does. Writing can take you places; better colleges/universities, admirable professions such as journalist or anything that has to do with a person using their writing skills.
Language is a major factor to this because the higher your knowledge of your language, the more you have to write since it is your speech you are expressing. James Moffett makes it
"It is impossible to understand the teaching of writing in America if one does not realize that, in one form or another, from first grade through graduate school, it serves mostly to test reading” (276). Writing is used to test if a student can read and to what extent they can do this. The ability to do this can further your success in education and also future careers that you decide to pursue. Writing can be defined in different ways and have importance in different levels. This all depends on the person and educator.
As a future English teacher, I don’t see writing as just being a tester to a student’s reading ability. In my experience it has helped me express thoughts that I could not do verbally and honestly, in a more professional matter. I also find it as a stress reliever when my mind is scrambled with thoughts and in a sense it helps organization of them. Of course the ability to read is important and what the mind can intake from the reading one does. Writing can take you places; better colleges/universities, admirable professions such as journalist or anything that has to do with a person using their writing skills.
Language is a major factor to this because the higher your knowledge of your language, the more you have to write since it is your speech you are expressing. James Moffett makes it
Hernandez 2
known that inner speech is a
significant part of teaching writing, amongst other things that can contribute
to better teaching it. Moffett does not belittle any of the factors to teaching
writing instead suggest improvement, so that we as educators can assist
students to progress their writing skills. He focuses on what is critical to
teaching writing and at what level they are to be placed without trying to
correct anyone’s way of teaching. James Moffett sought to make a positive
difference in how writing should be taught.
He focused on his main ideas which he had experience and evidence to support his suggestions to make such improvements. In my research, Moffett’s attention was inner speech because that is the where writing comes from. “Most of all, keeping inner speech as the matrix of all writing keeps teaching of writing centered on authentic writing” (234). It is easy for a student to paraphrase from another's work. Moffett thought that if an educator emphasize on a student's own inner speech and how to practice it, they wouldn't have to copy as often as they do.
Most educators find that drawing or "scribble scrabble" as many call it, is nonsense. They can believe that there is absolutely no use and nothing can come of it. This should be encouraged often because “drawing is one aspect of writing. Because it bridges between the invisible world of spirit and the visible world of matter … “(276). It is a student’s beginning to the literature world and what it has to offer. From there the educator should follow up with assisting the student in authoring their drawings.
Moffett insist on what approaches can make writing for students a smoother process. In regards to inner speech, “the crafting approach to writing can help a student see alternative and better ways to say what he has in his mind…” (277). This approach simply advices the student on how to construct acceptable sentences which turn into paragraphs and the organization of
He focused on his main ideas which he had experience and evidence to support his suggestions to make such improvements. In my research, Moffett’s attention was inner speech because that is the where writing comes from. “Most of all, keeping inner speech as the matrix of all writing keeps teaching of writing centered on authentic writing” (234). It is easy for a student to paraphrase from another's work. Moffett thought that if an educator emphasize on a student's own inner speech and how to practice it, they wouldn't have to copy as often as they do.
Most educators find that drawing or "scribble scrabble" as many call it, is nonsense. They can believe that there is absolutely no use and nothing can come of it. This should be encouraged often because “drawing is one aspect of writing. Because it bridges between the invisible world of spirit and the visible world of matter … “(276). It is a student’s beginning to the literature world and what it has to offer. From there the educator should follow up with assisting the student in authoring their drawings.
Moffett insist on what approaches can make writing for students a smoother process. In regards to inner speech, “the crafting approach to writing can help a student see alternative and better ways to say what he has in his mind…” (277). This approach simply advices the student on how to construct acceptable sentences which turn into paragraphs and the organization of
Hernandez 3
their paper in general. “A
person cannot write something he cannot say at least to himself ...” (278). He
also expresses that no person should write something that they cannot fully understand
themselves.
During my research, I noticed that Moffett loves and encourages the idea of being honest to ones work. “True authoring occurs naturally to the extent that the writer is composing with raw material” (278). Raw material is based on one’s own feelings, memories, and experiences. If the student is given a good topic as to where he can write using his own ideas, there would be no need to use outside material. This can also give the student a sense of accomplishment because of not having to copy from someone else’s ideas.
James Moffett is looked at as a motivator and positive figure in educating students how to write. He not only made educators revise their way of teaching but also made change throughout curriculum that was a must. “In any case, wouldn’t educators do well asking constantly how much authoring their writing program honestly calls for and how much it truly aims to teach writing for the sake of writing” (277). He was not trying to question any of the educator’s methods but simply making progress towards becoming better educators. “Let’s direct discourse toward its own self-transformation and self-transcendence. In doing so we will also accomplish better the traditional curriculum goals.” (246). Once in a while, educators need to be guided to make better decisions, which can help the development skills of their students.
During my research, I noticed that Moffett loves and encourages the idea of being honest to ones work. “True authoring occurs naturally to the extent that the writer is composing with raw material” (278). Raw material is based on one’s own feelings, memories, and experiences. If the student is given a good topic as to where he can write using his own ideas, there would be no need to use outside material. This can also give the student a sense of accomplishment because of not having to copy from someone else’s ideas.
James Moffett is looked at as a motivator and positive figure in educating students how to write. He not only made educators revise their way of teaching but also made change throughout curriculum that was a must. “In any case, wouldn’t educators do well asking constantly how much authoring their writing program honestly calls for and how much it truly aims to teach writing for the sake of writing” (277). He was not trying to question any of the educator’s methods but simply making progress towards becoming better educators. “Let’s direct discourse toward its own self-transformation and self-transcendence. In doing so we will also accomplish better the traditional curriculum goals.” (246). Once in a while, educators need to be guided to make better decisions, which can help the development skills of their students.
“It is important that educators try to hold this trend to
the highest conception of writing, the one that has the most educational value
and the one that works because it stems from meaning and motive.” (279).
Works Cited:
Moffett, James. “Integrity in the
Teaching of Writing.” The Phi Delta
Kappan. 61.4 (1979): 276-279. Print.
Moffett, James. “Writing, Inner
Speech and Meditation.” College English.
44.3 (1982): 231-246. Print.
Article on student transfer
You guys should probably read this when you have a spare moment (click here).
I would give extra credit points to anyone who emails a CUNY four-year and gets more information about how transfer credits are assessed!
I would give extra credit points to anyone who emails a CUNY four-year and gets more information about how transfer credits are assessed!
Sample of strong Moffett Essay
James
Moffett Research Paper
James
Moffett has influenced many educators with the ideas he contributed to the
field of teaching and writing. His ideas went beyond the classroom and the
cognitive mind to improve writing and reading skills for teachers and students.
Moffett advocated the ideas of student-centered curriculum such as dialogue,
developing reasoning skills, getting in touch with emotion and child
psychological development to improve students’ writing. He believed in
student-centered reading activities as well, which helped students develop more
of an interest in reading and writing. He also developed four stages for
students to use to develop their writing. He believed in the idea that learning
is a social and spiritual concept which we learn together. With all his ideas
that he encouraged the education system to adapt, he became an inspiration for
teachers and students to learn to become better writers.
Moffett
believes that there are four stages of discourse: inner verbalization, outer
vocalization, correspondence, and formal writing (Moffett 197). He argued that
this stage process was essential for students to write through so they can find
their own unique style and voice. He believes writing is a socializing process
and by using the world around them in their everyday experiences it can help
students develop their own flair of writing. Moffett stated that using the
senses between speaker and audience heightens development of writing. The activity
changes from thinking to speaking to writing to publishing (Moffett 197).
Piaget and Vygotsky agree with Moffett that early egocentric speech of the
child becomes gradually “socialized” and adapts itself to other people (Moffett
200). This theory is the view from our self to the world, form a point to an
area, and from inner speech to a public universe. We interpret the world around
us based on social experiences and what the world wants us to view it as. Moffett believed that if we give students the
freedom to write from experience than just based on the reading, their writing
would be better.
Moffett
is a big advocator for student-centered curriculum. He was certain that no
matter how different students were in their race, wealth status, or age, if
students were able to express themselves freely their writing would develop and
they would find their own voice. Three important aspects that derive from this
concept are individualization, interaction, and integration. Students learn at
their own level by select what activities they want to do, interact and
interact by learning from other students, and students can develop their
learning using their own cognitive skills. Moffett believes that each student
learns at difference paces and has different strategies to form concepts. By using a more student-centered approach you
are assisting to each child’s needs and they are learning from fellow students
as well.
Moffett’s
theory for student-centered reading gives students the power to choose whatever
they want to read. This theory allows students to develop more of an interest
in reading and broadening their literacy skills. Moffett’s theory also suggests
that using different activities to discuss the readings such as peer discussions
and performing texts help develop their understanding of the reading. By
picking a book of their own choice gives students more encouragement to develop
their writing skills based on something they have an interest in. Moffett
stated that by transforming the text from the literature to another form of
writing such as poetry, or a fable can further the students writing development
(Moffett &Wagner 72). Moffett and Wagner also concurred that collaborative
learning can help students reach their maximum ability in learning literacy
(73).
Moffett’s theory of writing through dialogue was also a brilliant idea that furthers the education of writing. He stated that the point of students to write was to see what they learned and understood. All oral conversation including improvisation, and discussion, provides pre-writing activities, and transcribing spontaneous speech provides fine practice on literacy skills. Using dialogue deals with both reasoning and fictionalizing (Moffett 46). Moffett believed that this theory generates and clarifies one’s thoughts. The purpose of this theory is to explore all possible ideas without feeling the pressure to build a case for the assignment. Being able to discuss infinite possible ideas with someone helps generate a more focused appropriate case for the writing. This theory ties back into his previous stages of writing theory, were an audience is necessary for brainstorming a writing assignment. Moffett believed that sociality is one of the best learning tools. By using writing and speaking dialogues in social contexts Moffett stated that when you are equally discussing an issue to another person, the student is not being assessed which leads to them producing more ideas, as oppose to a teacher whose role would be to assess. But Moffett believed if the teachers and all students create an equal discussion it can lead to important learning (Gage 406).
Moffett’s theory of writing through dialogue was also a brilliant idea that furthers the education of writing. He stated that the point of students to write was to see what they learned and understood. All oral conversation including improvisation, and discussion, provides pre-writing activities, and transcribing spontaneous speech provides fine practice on literacy skills. Using dialogue deals with both reasoning and fictionalizing (Moffett 46). Moffett believed that this theory generates and clarifies one’s thoughts. The purpose of this theory is to explore all possible ideas without feeling the pressure to build a case for the assignment. Being able to discuss infinite possible ideas with someone helps generate a more focused appropriate case for the writing. This theory ties back into his previous stages of writing theory, were an audience is necessary for brainstorming a writing assignment. Moffett believed that sociality is one of the best learning tools. By using writing and speaking dialogues in social contexts Moffett stated that when you are equally discussing an issue to another person, the student is not being assessed which leads to them producing more ideas, as oppose to a teacher whose role would be to assess. But Moffett believed if the teachers and all students create an equal discussion it can lead to important learning (Gage 406).
Moffett
started his advocacy for better writing with the psychological development of
the child. He identified that it wasn’t about higher thinking but about making
thoughts and feeling coherent to one’s self. His research state that as
children we project ourselves first into animals, creatures, heroes, and
legendary figures and then gradually we withdraw projection back to our self.
We start to recognize personal meaning symbolized in our myths (Moffett
418). His theory stated that students
need to be in touch with their inner most self before they can start to write
better. He believes that women are more in tuned with their emotional side than
men are. In Moffetts’s essay The Spiritual Awakening, he argues that learning
is a social and spiritual concept that we all must learn as one. He believes
that students need to learn how to connect within them to be able to write for
themselves. He argues that a student cannot develop that through standardize
testing. Moffett defines spirituality as all inclusive is the one that most
applies to education. Advocates of holistic education, for example, insist on
the total development of all levels of a human being (Moffett 28). He sees
education as a whole not breaking them down to us against them and completion
against each other. In order to change education to a more holistic education,
Moffett suggested that we have to understand the system behind public
education. He believes they are too organizational and political instead
essentials of the learning process. His vision is to have schools that give
access to everything to students and teachers. He wants them to be able to have
an abundance of material to help students learn. Although Moffett has not
further this advocacy of his, it started a trend that led to other researchers
following Moffett’s vision of spiritual perspective in the education system.
The
important ideas, theories, and visions of Moffett’s have led to further
development of our education system to enhance students writing and teachers
teaching writing. His theory has practiced true in most schools. His visions
have also led other researchers to advance his concepts into more practical
use. His theories are constantly evolving the writing process in our education
system.
Work Cited
1.
Gage, Tom. Harmonic Learning: The Congruent Education Models of Fethullah Gullen and
James Moffett. Peaceful Coexistence. (2009),
pp.397-406.
2. Moffet,
James. Active Voice: A writing program across the curriculum. 2nd
Ed Boynton/Cook Publishers. Portsmouth,
NH. (1992)
3. Moffett,
J., & Wagner, B. J. Student-centered
language arts, K-12. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers Heinemann. (1992)
4.
Moffett, J., & Wagner, B. J. The English
Journal, Vol. 80, No. 6. (Oct., 1991), pp. 70-73.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)